Stealing the Election For Trump

PRESIDENT ELECT DONALD TRUMP only receives one intelligence report a week, rather than the usual presidential one a day. You can actually understand his wanting to do it that way, and doing it, but the question remains: is it a good idea? Get in touch with me when you have something new and different, he says. I don't want or need to hear the same thing every day. Is it a good idea to take a short cut on intelligence briefings? Doesn't Trump need all the intelligence he can get? We must bear in mind that according to the entire intelligence community, especially the CIA, Russia used cyber warfare to influence the outcome of Trump's election, in favor of Trump, and that Trump denies it. Trump does not relish the prospect of his friend Vladimir Putin begin caught in the act, because it makes Donald look bad, very bad, as if he is part of the election hacking. That seems suspicious, Also, Trump is dismissing the entire CIA report as just another excuse being circulated by people, presumably democrats, angry about the election's outcome, which Trump, apparently living in some self manufactured dream land, calls a "landslide". How you can win an election landslide while losing the vote by nearly three million votes he does not explain. This election was far from a landslide. 1932 was a landslide. 1964 was a landslide. 1972 was a landslide. 1984 was a landslide. bit not 2016.Trump got 306 electoral college votes, if they all actually vote for him, which they will not. that is not a landslide. Nor it is a good idea to ignore or deny warnings by the CIA, unless you. yourself are part of the crime being investigated. This lame accusation being made by Trump that the CIA is wrong, and that charges of Russian hacking are only a loser's excuse do not add up, they make no sense, unless Trump is guilty. Did the Russians really hack into the election? Did they influence it? How? What exactly did they do? Did Trump know about it? We'll find out the answers to all these, and more questions, and soon, we hope.