mitt vs. barrack, rich vs. poor

It is disappointing that rick santorum has dropped out of the republican presidential race. he was fun. Now, with newt and ron simply treading water, with the race over, we'll have to adjust to a new source of entertainment: mitt versus barrack hussein.

barrack hussein'll kick mitt's butt, the way it looks now. just today barrack hussein was speaking loudly about the need to tax millionaires more than poor people, like he often does, and once again, it is obvious that the idea will never pass the conservative corporate owned and controlled united states senate.

the conservative viewpoint seems to be that if you go after the wealthy, you are instigating "class warfare", that lower taxes for everybody is the answer, even with a huge military and huge infrastructure repair needs. if you punish achievement, you discourage it, say the conservatives.  highly dubious others say.

the democrats want to tax the rich, the republicans don't. how surprising. trickle down economics, ronald reagan style. let the wealthy keep their money, and they of their own accord will invest it in ways which benefit the poor much more than the government ever could. yeah, right. haven't we seen through that yet?

yes, we have. obama will totally dominate romney in the economic ideological war soon to come, because the ninety nine per cent, or at least the fifty one per cent, will support the poor over the rich. most of us, after all, are poor.

the economy is improving, after the mess obama inherited from bush. general motors is alive and bin laden is dead, thanks to barrack.  the massive federal debt is not obama's fault, we are all to balme, and we all know that.

mitt must move to the middle to even have a chance to  win, which he won't, and that will force the real right wingers, like gingrich and santorum, to hold their noses and vote for mitt.

mitt must move to the center to win, because america is more a centrist country than a conservative one, and right now, liberal economics is more popular than conservative economics, because most of us think the rich should pay more taxes than the poor.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR THE OTHER ARTICLES IN TODAY'S ISSUE OF THE TRUTHLESS RECONCILER.THANKS!