Wednesday, February 1, 2012

People vs. Corporations

Having established that heavy mud slinging is the best strategy for Mitt and Newt among their republican constituents, the question now is how will this affect republican chances in the general election against Obama.

By election time both Mitt and Newt will be farily well covered with republican mud, Newt, the erratic, volatile adulterer, Mitt, the high rollin' wheeler dealer who thinks  $370,000  is chump change.

Obama, a frim fidelity family man, and humble grass community organizer among the poor, presents an interesting contrast to the exciting lives of Mitt and Newt.

All the republican candidates have something to offer. Mitt's stable family life is an asset.  His flip flopping and wide spectrum of liberal-moderate-conservative political beliefs indicate open mindedness as much as political pandering.

Newt's vision of an American colony on the moon reflects a positive can do spirit, impractical as it may be. Ron Paul's statement that he would send only a few politicians to the moon received laughter and agreement.

Anyone who is elected president will do it with corporate money, and will therefore be a corporate spokesperson, including Obama. We live in a corporate country, and increasingly, a corporate world.

On the internet the non corporate 99% can stay in touch, organize, and advocate for the masses. Most of the massses support corporate globalism, whether they know it or not. And that's fine. Our corporate world is neither inherently evil, nor is it the enemy. An ounce of reform is worth a pound of revolution.

Please scroll down for the other articles in this issue of The Truthless Reconciler! Thanks!

No comments:

Post a Comment