Resisting Having Computers Installed Within Us

PRESIDENT BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA does not, for a fact, have or use an I Phone. The official explanation is that it is impossible to guarantee absolute security; there would always be a one in a billion chance that a hacker could break in on the President, no matter how many security precautions were taken. Or maybe the chances would be far higher than one in a billion. This is somewhat unnerving. What does it say about I Phone security for the rest of us? It probablly says that the NSA and Al Qaeda are listening in to our conversations any damned time they please. Which one would you rather hide from? Probably the NSA. What possible harm can a small disorganized group of terrorists really do to us? Obama would probably love to have an I Phone, and would probably love to dive into the social media; he's that kind of guy. Hand held computer communications gadgets are changing the world. They will have a huge impact on politics and power, we just don't know for sure what that impact will be yet. The computer revolution will either expand democracy, or kill it, most likely. If we the people ever accede to having micro chips installed inside our bodies democracy might well be finished. We would indeed consent to internal chips if we thought they could greatly benefit us, wouldn't we? Sure, we would. So, with regard to the benefits of inserting micro chips inside our bodies, guess who, over the next few years, will be expousing the virtues of computers inside us? Why, government, and industry, of course, The usual suspects. Those who control us already, and want more of the same. Our wealthy elite corporate masters. But don't let 'em fool you. All they really want is control over you, not benefits for you. Here's to the people of the world, and to their firm resolve to keep computers outside their bodies, and, no closer to us than our ring fingers.