Finding Some, Any Use For the Court

As MUCH AS EVER, if not more, we the American people, and our beloved democratic republic needs help from an entity which was designed to render it; the United States Supreme Court. Unfortunately, at least as of now, such help shall not be forthcoming. And, like everyting else controversial these days, the issue involves Donald Trump. The fact that millions of Americans watched live and in living color the then president inciting and applauding a violent insurrrection against his government and country has consequences, intended and otherwise. The Colorado Supreme Court, barely, ruled that Trump is not eligible to be president or dog catcher, because his said violent insurrection violated the constitution. Sounds reasonable. Other states are in the process of perhaps arriving at the same conclusion, although Michigan ruled otherwise recently. In Michigan, criminals are evidently welcome on the presidential ballot. And, to be clear, no, we the people should never have the opportunity to vote for and elect whomever they choose. Not if theywant Taylor Swift, for example, to become president. Taylor, wonderful lovely person that she is, is only thirty four years old, and therefore, ineligible for another year. So, you Swiftie's'll have to wait, but not much longer. For a job as difficult and important as the American presidency, there simply must be reasonable qualifications. Hardly surprisingly, Trump is appealling the Colorado ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. The timing couldn't be better, or more urgent. For the sake of democracy in America and thus for America herself, the court badly needs to take Trump's appeal, hear it, and rule on it. They need to "expidate it", in legalize. But instead, this this reprobate infested body of law did quite the opposite; refused to hear the case, at the precise mmoment in American history when that course of action does...not..work. As we know, the court has the right to do this, largely because it, in its finite wisdom, gave itself that right. Predictably,cowardly, the nine justices, two of whom are probable sexual criminals, several probable white collar criminals, and and six arguably simply fools, provided no reason for their inaction. This is their self imposed perogative as well, but, normally they, or at least one of them have something to say as to the reason for the court's evident indolance. Ducking their responsibilities, twice. Refried fascism. The real reason for the punt? Many are possible. They need more time to see how other states play out, or more time to give consideration to the issues as they develop. That's nonsense, because the issue has already played out, in one very legitimate, important American state; the test case is simple, clearly laid out, ready for litigation. We move on, in our search for raional rationale. We may never find it. We can only guess. What about the possibility that the six far right wing members of the coukrt are dyed in the wool Trumpers, and quite simply do not want to placed in the position of being asked to, of having to either make a ruling that will keep their MAGA icon cult leader off the ballot nationwide, thus depriving him and them of even the most remote hope that a nre are of Trump the suzzerain shall return, or, giving the logal go ahead to an outright criminal and treasonous traitor actually runnning for and perhaps becoming president, therefore not only angering most of America, but maybe, just maybe, touching off a twenty first century civil war. Or, if not that, then further dividing an already deeply divided nation. The conservatives on this court have already long since demonstrated that they are socially warped and legally twisted, embued with all manner of intellectual nonsense.Hell, you wouldn't be surprised that they believe the election was stolen from Trump, that climate change is a hoax, and that evolution is wrong, because it isn't in the holy bible.